Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Vs M/S Sanman Rice Mills & Ors.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Punjab State Civil...

In Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. vs M/S Sanman Rice Mills & Ors. [2024 INSC 742], the Supreme Court of India upheld an arbitral award and emphasized limited judicial intervention under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute concerned outstanding dues between the Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation (appellant) and M/s Sanman Rice Mills (respondent). While the arbitral award in favor of the appellant was upheld by the Additional District Judge under Section 34, it was later set aside by the High Court under Section 37. The Supreme Court, citing precedents such as MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd. (2019) and Konkan Railway Corp. v. Chenab Bridge Project (2023), reinstated the award, stating that courts should not interfere with arbitral decisions based on alternative views of facts or contractual interpretation, thus preserving the integrity of the arbitral process.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Navigating Legal Boundaries: The Challenge of Passport Renewal Amid Pending Criminal Cases in India

The renewal of a passport when a criminal case is pending against an individual in India poses a complex and intriguing legal dilemma. The question before the constitutional courts is whether an accused can renew their passport like any other citizen without prior permission or a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the trial court... Read more »

Decoding Section 127: Procedural Safeguards and Judicial Perspectives on Tax Case Transfers

Jurisdiction in tax assessment matters often appears to be a rigid framework governed by territorial boundaries. However, Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, introduces a dynamic mechanism that allows for the transfer of cases between assessing authorities to facilitate better administration. This article delves into... Read more »

Supreme Court Overrules Azeez Basha: Reframes Minority Institution Criteria in Aligarh Muslim University Case

In AMU v. Naresh Agarwal (2024 INSC 856), a 4:3 Constitution Bench overruled Azeez Basha (1967), holding that an institution does not lose minority status merely because it was created by statute. Chief Justice Chandrachud clarified that “establishment” under Article 30(1) depends on the community’s role in founding it, not on statutory incorporation, and set... Read more » Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.