Sangeet Vs. State Of Haryana, (2013) 2 SCC 452.

Home
/
Publications
/
Case Snippets
/
Sangeet Vs. State Of Haryana, (2013)...

The court observed that, it is a common misperception that a person facing a life sentence has an unassailable right to be released after serving 14 or 20 years in jail. No such right exists for the prisoner. Subject to any remission granted by the appropriate government under Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which in turn is subject to the procedural checks in that section and the substantive checks in Section 433A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a convict serving a life sentence is expected to remain in custody until the end of his life.

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Supreme Court Mandates Holistic Evaluation of Disabilities for MBBS Admissions, Rejects Mechanical Application of Disability Guidelines

In Omkar v. Union of India (2024 INSC 775), the Supreme Court held that MBBS admission for PwD candidates cannot be denied solely on the percentage of disability. Granting relief to a candidate with 45% speech and language disability, it ruled that assessment must consider the practical impact on course Read more »

Gattification Through Appellate Paralysis: Wto’s Dispute Settlement Crisis And Pathways Forward

Anup Koushik Karavadi and Kanishk Tiwari Introduction The World Trade Organization (WTO), established in 1995, replaced the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which began in 1947. GATT set early rules for international trade but functioned mainly as a diplomatic arrangement, lacking strong enforcement mechanisms. The WTO carried forward Read more »

Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel Vs. Union of India & Ors

In Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court emphasized that the benefit of a favorable judicial order against government actions should be extended to similarly situated individuals without requiring them to approach the courts. The appellant, an officer in the Army Dental Corps, sought Read more »