In N. Asha Devi v. R. Aravind Kumar & Anr ., the Supreme Court held that where a suit is hopelessly barred by limitation on a plain reading of the plaint, the plaint must be rejected under Order… Read more »
In siyaram education society v. Chhaya d/o baliram dhave & ors., 2026 insc 871, the hon’ble supreme court held that a writ petition under article 226 of the constitution is maintainable against a private unaided educational institution where… Read more »
In National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd. v. Ishvakoo (India) Pvt. Ltd. the Supreme Court held that an unsuccessful party in arbitration is not, merely by reason of having lost the arbitration, precluded from invoking Section 9 of the… Read more »
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in Rahul v. State of U.P., 2026 INSC 825, relying upon Prashant Bharti v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Rajiv Thapar & Others v. Madan Lal Kapoor, reiterated that the High Court,… Read more »
In Sameem Begum & Ors v. K. Venkat Swamy & Anr. , the Supreme Court delivered a pivotal judgment, unequivocally affirming that the absence of dependency does not extinguish the right of a legal representative to claim compensation… Read more »
In Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. v. R.K. Mining Private Limited, subsequently reaffirmed in U.V. Satyanarayana and Ors. v. M/s Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that Execution Petitions arising from arbitral awards… Read more »
In Bharat Aviation Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. vs. Rahul Sudhindra Soni, 2026, Live Law BHC-OS:11556, the Bombay High Court reiterated that contractual obligations arising under a valid service bond are capable of enforcement, and that a bond condition… Read more »
In S.C. Narang Vs. State (NCT Of Delhi), 2025 INSC 688, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 cannot be used to punish Chairman of the school's Managing Committee as he… Read more »
In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Shamsher Singh, 2025 INSC 503, the Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with a Criminal Appeal set aside the impugned order of the Hon’ble High Court and held that Section 307 (Attempt to… Read more »
In AMU v. Naresh Agarwal (2024 INSC 856), a 4:3 Constitution Bench overruled Azeez Basha (1967), holding that an institution does not lose minority status merely because it was created by statute. Chief Justice Chandrachud clarified that “establishment”… Read more »
