Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel Vs. Union of India & Ors

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Lt. Col. Suprita...

In Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court emphasized that the benefit of a favorable judicial order against government actions should be extended to similarly situated individuals without requiring them to approach the courts. The appellant, an officer in the Army Dental Corps, sought parity with others granted permanent commission by the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) despite revised age criteria disqualifying them. The Court held that the appellant was identically placed with those beneficiaries and, citing Amrit Lal Berry v. Collector of Central Excise and K.I. Shephard v. Union of India, reiterated that equitable relief must be uniformly applied unless expressly prohibited. Rejecting the AFT’s reasoning that the appellant’s non-participation in earlier litigation precluded her claim, the Court, exercising its powers under Article 142, quashed the AFT’s order and directed the authorities to grant the appellant permanent commission.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

The Concept Of Minimum Wages Under The Code On Wages: An Analytical Study

The concept of minimum wages is fundamental in ensuring fair remuneration for labour and upholding human dignity. In India, the regulation of minimum wages has undergone significant changes with the enactment of the Code on Wages, 2019, which seeks to consolidate and simplify wage-related laws.... Read more »

Dharmendra Sharma Vs. Agra Development Authority, 2024 INSC 667

The Supreme Court addressed a dispute over the delayed possession of an apartment. The appellant sought a refund with interest due to the respondent’s failure to provide necessary completion and firefighting clearance certificates. When the Respondent had pleaded the application to be barred by limitation on the ground that the date on which the possession... Read more » Read more »

Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. Chief Minister, Maharashtra, SLP (C) 15737/2019, Judgment date: 05-05-2021

The classification of Marathas as a socially and educationally backward class was unreasonable as they belonged to a politically dominant caste with significant economic resources. The court also concluded that the majority opinion in the Indra Sawhney case was correct and that the limit of 50 percent for caste-based reservations did not need consideration by... Read more » Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.