Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. General Manager & Anr

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Ajay Protech Pvt....

In Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd. v. General Manager & Anr., 2024 INSC 889, the Supreme Court clarified that under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, courts can extend the mandate of an arbitral tribunal even after its expiry, provided “sufficient cause” exists. The tribunal’s mandate, which lapsed on 09.04.2021, was extended till 31.12.2024 after the Court considered its earlier COVID-19 order excluding the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 for limitation purposes. Reversing the Gujarat High Court’s dismissal of the extension application, the Court emphasized that “sufficient cause” under Section 29A(5) must be liberally interpreted to ensure the effective resolution of disputes, aligning with its pro-arbitration stance and duty to facilitate completion of arbitral proceedings.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Balu Sudam Khalde & Another Vs. State of Maharashtra; 2023 SCC Online SC 355

The Evidence of Injured witness has greater evidentiary value, their statements can't be discarded lightly. Also the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that, Suggestions made to the witness by the defence counsel and the reply to such suggestions would definitely form part of the evidence and can be relied upon Read more »

Actions of the Governors and the President are subject to judicial review

The Hon'ble Supreme Court, while dealing with a Writ Petition filed by the State of Tamil Nadu, held that the Governor cannot keep bills submitted to them pending without response indefinitely. The Court also held that delays in granting assent to bills that were repassed by the legislature, without any Read more »

Cheque Law In Cash Crisis: How P.C. Hari Rewrites Enforceability At The Cost Of Commercial Certainty

Anup Koushik Karavadi and Kanishk Tiwari Introduction The decision of the Kerala High Court in P.C. Hari v. Shine Varghese1 presents a significant yet contentious development in the law governing dishonour of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. While the Court endeavours to harmonize the NI Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.