+91 9052538538
Karavadi Email Id

Ambience Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. Ambience Island Apartment Owners, (2021) 2 SCC 163

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Ambience Infrastructure (P)...

The Supreme Court held that the execution proceedings and original proceedings are separate and independent. An appeal under S. 23 of the Consumer Protection Act will not lie to Supreme Court against an order which has been passed in the course of execution proceedings. An appeal under S. 23 is maintainable against an order which has been passed by NCDRG on a complaint where the value of goods or services and compensation, if any, claimed, exceeds the threshold which is prescribed. Hence the appeal under S. 23 of the CP Act against the order in execution dismissed as being non-maintainable.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Identification of the father will not precede the privacy rights of Children.

In APARNA AJINKYA FIRODIA v. AJINKYA ARUN FIRODIA (2023 INSC 146), the Supreme Court ruled that a DNA test of a child cannot be ordered merely to establish adultery in matrimonial disputes. The case arose from a husband’s application for a DNA test to question the paternity of his wife’s second child during ongoing divorce... Read more » Read more »

Ajay Madhusudan Patel & Ors. v. Jyotrindra S. Patel & Ors

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ajay Madhusudan Patel while appointing a sole arbitrator, reiterated factors that signify the intention of a non-signatory to be bound by the Arbitration Agreement. The factors as laid down in Cox and Kings being – mutual intent of parties, relationship of a non-signatory with a signatory... Read more »

Dwarika Prasad (D) Thr. Lrs. Vs. Prithvi Raj Singh

In Dwarika Prasad (D) Thr. Lrs. vs. Prithvi Raj Singh, 2024 INSC 1030, the Supreme Court held that filing a separate application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is unnecessary when seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure,... Read more » Read more »



Karavadi & Associates – A Reputed Law Firm providing Litigation Services, Litigation Management Services & Legal Advisory Services.

Contact Info

Hyderabad:

First Floor, Pooja Residency,
Plot No.C-8,
Westend Meadows Road,
Behind Power Welfare Society,
Kokapet, Narsingi, Hyderabad,
Telangana 500075.

Vijayawada:

Flat No. 508, C - Block,
Aarnika apartments,
Beside Aparna Amaravathi, Pathuru Road,
Tadepalli - 522501.

Contact Info

Ongole:

#7-7-25/1, Lawyerpet, VIP Road, Ongole, Prakasam District,
Andhra Pradesh - 523001.

New Delhi:

D-256, LGF,
Defence Colony,
New Delhi- 110024.

Contact Info:

+91 9052538538
Karavadi Email Id

© Copyright 2026 Karavadi & Associates, All Rights Reserved.

Cookie Policy Privacy PolicyTerms Of Use

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.

Agree Exit Site