Ambience Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. Ambience Island Apartment Owners, (2021) 2 SCC 163

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Ambience Infrastructure (P)...

The Supreme Court held that the execution proceedings and original proceedings are separate and independent. An appeal under S. 23 of the Consumer Protection Act will not lie to Supreme Court against an order which has been passed in the course of execution proceedings. An appeal under S. 23 is maintainable against an order which has been passed by NCDRG on a complaint where the value of goods or services and compensation, if any, claimed, exceeds the threshold which is prescribed. Hence the appeal under S. 23 of the CP Act against the order in execution dismissed as being non-maintainable.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Mere display of additional language does not amount to a violation of the Maharashtra Local Authorities Act 2022

Varshatai v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 486)Date of Judgment: 15 April 2025 In Varshatai v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 486), the Hon’ble Supreme Court addressed whether the Maharashtra Local Authorities (Official Languages) Act, 2022, prohibits the use of Urdu as an additional language on a municipal signboard. The dispute arose after the Municipal... Read more » Read more »

Ramesh Kumar v. State of Punjab (1993) Cri L.J. 1800 (SC)

It was held that, there is no need for identification parade where the witnesses already knew who the assailants were. Test identification parade is not a sine qua non in every case, that is, if the facts and circumstances of a case conclusively establish the guilt of the accused, then, there is no need to... Read more » Read more »

Consent, Criminalisation, And Context: Evaluating The Case For Revising The Pocso Threshold

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) was enacted to address the widespread problem of child sexual abuse and to remedy the limitations of the Indian Penal Code in prosecuting such offences. The statute adopts a strict liability model that considers all persons below eighteen incapable of providing... Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.