Bulldozer Justice Simply Unnacceptable – Citizens’ voices cannot be throttled by a threat of destroying their homes.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Bulldozer Justice Simply...

The Hon’ble Supreme Court while adjudicating a Suo Moto Writ Petition captioned “In Re Manoj Tibrewal Akash, 2024 INSC 863”(registered on the basis of a letter by a senior journalist) held that the state must follow due process of law before taking action to remove illegal encroachments or unlawfully constructed structures and issued a slew of directions to be followed before pursuing a road widening project. The demolition of the petitioner’s ancestral house in the present case was done without giving any proper notice and only through the public announcement of drum-beating. The Hon’ble Court observed that such conduct of the state authorities was “completely high-handed and without the authority of law” which warranted an interim punitive compensation of Rs 25 lakhs to the petitioner while also granting him liberty to exercise other legal remedies for compensation.The Hon’ble Court came down heavily upon the State by holding that Bulldozer justice is simply unacceptable under the rule of law and will reduce the constitutional right to property under Article 300A to a dead letter.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Decoding Section 127: Procedural Safeguards and Judicial Perspectives on Tax Case Transfers

Jurisdiction in tax assessment matters often appears to be a rigid framework governed by territorial boundaries. However, Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, introduces a dynamic mechanism that allows for the transfer of cases between assessing authorities to facilitate better administration. This article delves into... Read more »

Assessing Liability of Authorized Signatories in Cheque Dishonour

He who signs a dishonored cheque bears the consequences— a principle well-established by law and affirmed across several precedents. Determining the liability of a signatory is straightforward when the drawer is an individual. But what happens when a cheque is issued on behalf of a juristic person, such as a company? Who is held... Read more »

Rakesh Vaishnav v. Union of India, (2021) 1 SCC 590, 12-01-2021

In the case of protest against Farm Laws, due to failure of negotiation between Government and farmers and no solution in sight, The Supreme Court passed an extraordinary order of stay of implementation of the Farm Laws directed and Expert Committee set up by Court to resolve the conflict between the farmers and the Government. Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.