Mere display of additional language does not amount to a violation of the Maharashtra Local Authorities Act 2022

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Mere display of...

Varshatai v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 486)
Date of Judgment: 15 April 2025

In Varshatai v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 486), the Hon’ble Supreme Court addressed whether the Maharashtra Local Authorities (Official Languages) Act, 2022, prohibits the use of Urdu as an additional language on a municipal signboard. The dispute arose after the Municipal Council of Patur displayed its name in both Marathi and Urdu, which the appellant contested, arguing exclusive use of Marathi was mandated and any

The Court upheld the Hon’ble Bombay High Court’s view, holding that there is no statutory bar against using Urdu on such signage. Justice Dhulia, writing for the bench, emphasized that language is a tool for communication and not division. The Court highlighted India’s linguistic diversity and cultural plurality, noting that Urdu, like Marathi, is an Indian language that came into existence out of cultural confluence.

Referring to Article 345 and past precedent of a five-judge Bench decision in the case of  Uttar Pradesh Hindi Sahitya Sammelan v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2014) 9 SCC 716, (UP Hindi Sahitya Sammelan), the Court reiterated that states can allow multiple languages for official use. Urdu’s deep integration in legal and social discourse was also noted. The judgment underlined the constitutional value of tolerance, concluding that promoting inclusivity in language serves the public good, especially at the local governance level.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Neeraj Sud & Anr. Vs. Jaswinder Singh (Minor) & Anr. (2024 INSC 825)

In Neeraj Sud & Anr. vs. Jaswinder Singh (Minor) & Anr. (2024 INSC 825), the Supreme Court clarified that mere deterioration of a patient’s condition after surgery does not automatically indicate medical negligence. To establish negligence, it must be proven that the doctor failed to exercise due care or lacked the necessary skill or qualifications... Read more » Read more »

When To File a Second FIR – Supreme Court Reiterates

The Supreme Court’s ruling in State of Rajasthan v. Surendra Singh Rathore (2025 INSC 248) provides much-needed clarity on the circumstances under which a second FIR can be maintained. By holding that a second FIR is justified in cases involving counter-complaints, distinct scopes, broader conspiracies, or newly emerged facts, the Court has reinforced the principle... Read more » Read more »

M/s Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Katta Sujatha Reddy & Ors

In M/s Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Katta Sujatha Reddy & Ors., the Supreme Court recalled its earlier decision and restored the Telangana High Court’s judgment directing specific performance proportionate to the consideration paid for the sale of a property. The petitioner, having paid 90% of the sale consideration, sought specific performance after the... Read more » Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.