Mere display of additional language does not amount to a violation of the Maharashtra Local Authorities Act 2022

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Mere display of...

Varshatai v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 486)
Date of Judgment: 15 April 2025

In Varshatai v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 486), the Hon’ble Supreme Court addressed whether the Maharashtra Local Authorities (Official Languages) Act, 2022, prohibits the use of Urdu as an additional language on a municipal signboard. The dispute arose after the Municipal Council of Patur displayed its name in both Marathi and Urdu, which the appellant contested, arguing exclusive use of Marathi was mandated and any

The Court upheld the Hon’ble Bombay High Court’s view, holding that there is no statutory bar against using Urdu on such signage. Justice Dhulia, writing for the bench, emphasized that language is a tool for communication and not division. The Court highlighted India’s linguistic diversity and cultural plurality, noting that Urdu, like Marathi, is an Indian language that came into existence out of cultural confluence.

Referring to Article 345 and past precedent of a five-judge Bench decision in the case of  Uttar Pradesh Hindi Sahitya Sammelan v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2014) 9 SCC 716, (UP Hindi Sahitya Sammelan), the Court reiterated that states can allow multiple languages for official use. Urdu’s deep integration in legal and social discourse was also noted. The judgment underlined the constitutional value of tolerance, concluding that promoting inclusivity in language serves the public good, especially at the local governance level.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Supreme Court Reiterates Narrow Scope Of Interference Under Section 37 Arbitration Act

In Somdatt Builders – NCC – NEC (JV) vs. National Highways Authority of India & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 2058/2012), the Supreme Court upheld the arbitral tribunal’s award, emphasizing minimal judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. It reiterated that courts do not act as appellate bodies and can only set aside an... Read more » Read more »

Krishna Mahadev Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2021 Scc Online Bom 191

The court observed that, the circumstance of ‘last seen’, along with the failure to provide a reasonable explanation of the accused are not enough to establish the guilt of the accused being reasonable doubt. As the case was relying on the last seen theory and no plausible explanation was provided by the accused, the guilt... Read more » Read more »

The Beneficial intention of a legislation shall be given primacy in cases where two views prevail

Urmila Dixit v. Sunil Sharan Dixit (2025 INSC 20)Date of Judgment: 2 January 2025 In Urmila Dixit v. Sunil Sharan Dixit 2025 INSC 20, the Supreme Court ruled on the applicability of Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The case revolved around a mother who had gifted... Read more » Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.