Sometimes, In The Quest For Justice We End Up Doing Injustice.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Sometimes, In The...

In High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of U.P. & Ors., 2024 INSC 150, a Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court while overruling its own three-judge bench decision, unanimously held that automatic vacation of stay orders after a lapse of six months is against the basic tenets of justice, provides undue benefit to the respondents therein and that such orders can be vacated only after application of judicial mind by the concerned Court. The bench also observed that Article 142 which grants them extraordinary powers to do complete justice cannot be used to nullify the benefits derived from stay orders, ignore the substantive right of the parties to be heard before the passage of an adverse order and that such blanket direction of automatic vacation of stay amounts to making a dent to the jurisdiction of Hon’ble High Courts which consequentially amounts to making a dent to basic structure as well. Hon’ble Justice Pankaj Mithal in his separate concurring decision went on to opine that “sometimes, in the quest for justice we end up doing injustice” and the impugned three-judge bench decision in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited & Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation is an example of the same.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

An Application For Claiming Juvenility May Be Made Even After The Judgment And Order Of Conviction And Sentence Has Been Granted Against A Person Which Has Attained Finality.

In State Of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramji Lal Sharma & Anr., 2024 INSC 747, the Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with a miscellaneous application in a criminal appeal disposed earlier, set aside the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment thereby acquitting the Applicant as he was a minor at the time of commission of the offence.... Read more » Read more »

Navratan Lal Sharma Vs. Radha Mohan Sharma & Ors

In Navratan Lal Sharma v. Radha Mohan Sharma & Ors., the Supreme Court overturned the Rajasthan High Court’s dismissal of a recall application and held that restoring an appeal following a failed compromise is a statutory right and the sole remedy available to the aggrieved party. The appellant, whose suit for declaration was dismissed by... Read more » Read more »

Rethinking Scrutiny of Question of Fact under Writ Jurisdiction

Mere existence of a question of fact has long been considered an obstacle to Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution—a stance reinforced through numerous precedents pronounced by the Apex Court and consistently upheld by the High Courts. This reflects a deep-rooted judicial hesitancy to delve into factual questions... Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.