Arvind Kejriwal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2024 INSC 687

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Arvind Kejriwal Vs....

In the case of Arvind Kejriwal vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2024 INSC 687), the Supreme Court of India addressed the legality of Kejriwal’s arrest by the CBI and his subsequent request for bail. ​ Kejriwal, a prominent political figure, was implicated in a case involving alleged irregularities in the framing and implementation of the Excise Policy for 2021-2022. ​ The Supreme Court held that the CBI cannot justify the arrest and continued detention of an accused solely on the grounds that the accused is giving evasive replies during the investigation. ​ The Court emphasized that an accused has the right to remain silent and cannot be compelled to make self-incriminating statements. ​ This ruling underscores the importance of protecting the constitutional rights of the accused, particularly the right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution. ​ It reinforces that the power to arrest must be exercised judiciously and not as a tool for coercion. ​

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Gunshot Enough to Establish Intention to Cause Death for Offence of Attempt to Murder

In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Shamsher Singh, 2025 INSC 503, the Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with a Criminal Appeal set aside the impugned order of the… Read more »

Pulicherla Nagaraju alias Nagaraja Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh; (2006) 11 SCC 444

The Court reaffirmed that the mere fact that a witness is related to the deceased should not be the sole reason for rejecting their testimony. Instead, the evidence… Read more »

Sangeet Vs. State Of Haryana, (2013) 2 SCC 452.

The court observed that, it is a common misperception that a person facing a life sentence has an unassailable right to be released after serving 14 or 20… Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.