Pulicherla Nagaraju alias Nagaraja Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh; (2006) 11 SCC 444

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Pulicherla Nagaraju alias...

The Court reaffirmed that the mere fact that a witness is related to the deceased should not be the sole reason for rejecting their testimony. Instead, the evidence should be assessed for its trustworthiness and credibility. If found reliable and probable, it can be considered, but if it raises suspicion, it should be rejected.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

An Application For Claiming Juvenility May Be Made Even After The Judgment And Order Of Conviction And Sentence Has Been Granted Against A Person Which Has Attained Finality.

In State Of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramji Lal Sharma & Anr., 2024 INSC 747, the Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with a miscellaneous application in a criminal appeal disposed earlier, set aside the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment thereby acquitting the Applicant as he was a minor at the time of commission of the offence.... Read more » Read more »

Reconciling Conflicting Supreme Court Judgments: High Courts Must Harmonize Rather Than Choose

Judicial precedents play a crucial role in shaping legal principles and ensuring consistency in the application of the law. However, there are instances where two Supreme Court judgments appear to contradict each other, creating a complex situation for High Courts. How should High Courts proceed in such cases? Can they selectively follow... Read more »

Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd. v. General Manager & Anr.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ajay Protech extended time allowing the Arbitral Tribunal to pass an Award, even after expiry of the statutory period stipulated U/S. 29A(1) of the Act and held that ‘Sufficient Cause’ U/S. 29A(5) should be interpreted to “facilitate effective dispute resolution.” The dispute arose after the tribunal’s mandate... Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.