Sazid Khan Vs. State of Haryana, 2018 Scc Online P&H 1733

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Sazid Khan Vs....

The court held that, Criminal law does not recognise the terms ‘same cause of action’. A per se FIR cannot be cancelled once evidence implicating the petitioner in a conspiracy has been discovered. As soon as an accused makes an attempt to commit an offence, they are subject to punishment, and many offences of this nature can be charged simultaneously. When the facts and circumstances of the case warrant it, a person may be charged with both offences concurrently under Sections 138 of the NI Act and 420 of the IPC.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

The Exorbitant Price of Justice: Assessing Security Deposits in Arbitration Appeals under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Introduction: The Rationale Behind the 2015 Amendments The 2015 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act aimed to revolutionize the arbitration process in India, focusing on enhancing time and cost efficiency, and ensuring flexibility of procedures with minimal judicial intervention. Despite these progressive intentions, the imposition of 100% security deposits Read more »

When machines pollute knowledge: legal implications of AI data contamination in the indian context

– Anup Koushik Karavadi Introduction The exponential rise of generative artificial intelligence has redefined how digital information is created and consumed. However, this rapid advancement has also contaminated the global data environment. Large language models and other generative systems increasingly train on data drawn from the internet, much of which Read more »

Shivaji chintappa patil Vs. State of Maharashtra, Air 2021 Sc 1249

The court laid down certain guidelines which must be followed before a case against an accused can be fully established: (a) circumstances from which conclusion of guilt is drawn must be established fully, (b) there should be consistency between the facts established and the hypothesis of guilt of the accused, Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.