Sometimes, In The Quest For Justice We End Up Doing Injustice.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Sometimes, In The...

In High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of U.P. & Ors., 2024 INSC 150, a Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court while overruling its own three-judge bench decision, unanimously held that automatic vacation of stay orders after a lapse of six months is against the basic tenets of justice, provides undue benefit to the respondents therein and that such orders can be vacated only after application of judicial mind by the concerned Court. The bench also observed that Article 142 which grants them extraordinary powers to do complete justice cannot be used to nullify the benefits derived from stay orders, ignore the substantive right of the parties to be heard before the passage of an adverse order and that such blanket direction of automatic vacation of stay amounts to making a dent to the jurisdiction of Hon’ble High Courts which consequentially amounts to making a dent to basic structure as well. Hon’ble Justice Pankaj Mithal in his separate concurring decision went on to opine that “sometimes, in the quest for justice we end up doing injustice” and the impugned three-judge bench decision in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited & Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation is an example of the same.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Tarina Sen Vs. Union of India & Anr. 2024 INSC 752

In this Criminal Appeal, the Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings, quashing charges u/s 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code 1860 & S.13(2) r/with 13(1)(d) of… Read more »

Rethinking Scrutiny of Question of Fact under Writ Jurisdiction

Mere existence of a question of fact has long been considered an obstacle to Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution—a stance reinforced through numerous precedents1 pronounced… Read more »

When To File a Second FIR – Supreme Court Reiterates

The Supreme Court's ruling in State of Rajasthan v. Surendra Singh Rathore (2025 INSC 248) provides much-needed clarity on the circumstances under which a second FIR can be… Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.