Police must undertake a preliminary enquiry under section 173 (3) in cases where complaint doesn’t constitute a cognizable offencepunishable with more than 3 years.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Police must undertake...

In the case of Imran Pratapgarhi v. State of Gujarat 2025 INSC 410, the Supreme Court quashed an FIR against the appellant, a Rajya Sabha MP, for reciting and posting a poem at a public event. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 196, 197(1), 299, 302, and 57 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, claiming the poem incited hatred and undermined national unity. The Court held that the FIR was filed mechanically, lacked legal substance, and violated the appellant’s fundamental right to free speech under Article 19(1)(a).

After scrutinizing the Urdu poem and its translation, the Court found no reference to any religion, community, or incitement to violence. It emphasized that the poem conveyed a message of non-violence and resilience against injustice. The Court ruled that no offence was made out under the cited BNS provisions and criticized the High Court for ignoring constitutional safeguards. Highlighting the need for a preliminary inquiry under Section 173(3) BNSS before registering such FIR’s.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Cheque Law In Cash Crisis: How P.C. Hari Rewrites Enforceability At The Cost Of Commercial Certainty

The decision of the Kerala High Court in P.C. Hari v. Shine Varghese1 presents a significant yet contentious development in the law governing dishonour of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. While the Court endeavours to harmonize the NI Act with provisions of the Income Tax Act, particularly Section 269SS... Read more »

Ambience Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. Ambience Island Apartment Owners, (2021) 2 SCC 163

The Supreme Court held that the execution proceedings and original proceedings are separate and independent. An appeal under S. 23 of the Consumer Protection Act will not lie to Supreme Court against an order which has been passed in the course of execution proceedings. An appeal under S. 23 is maintainable against an order which... Read more » Read more »

Substance Over Form: The Supreme Court’s Fiduciary Turn in Resource Allocation

Abstract The Supreme Court’s decision in Kamla Nehru Memorial Trust v. U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (2025 INSC 791) represents more than the resolution of a dispute over an industrial allotment. It marks a doctrinal convergence of three significant strands of Indian jurisprudence: (i) the insistence on reciprocal obligations in the... Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.