Police must undertake a preliminary enquiry under section 173 (3) in cases where complaint doesn’t constitute a cognizable offencepunishable with more than 3 years.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Police must undertake...

In the case of Imran Pratapgarhi v. State of Gujarat 2025 INSC 410, the Supreme Court quashed an FIR against the appellant, a Rajya Sabha MP, for reciting and posting a poem at a public event. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 196, 197(1), 299, 302, and 57 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, claiming the poem incited hatred and undermined national unity. The Court held that the FIR was filed mechanically, lacked legal substance, and violated the appellant’s fundamental right to free speech under Article 19(1)(a).

After scrutinizing the Urdu poem and its translation, the Court found no reference to any religion, community, or incitement to violence. It emphasized that the poem conveyed a message of non-violence and resilience against injustice. The Court ruled that no offence was made out under the cited BNS provisions and criticized the High Court for ignoring constitutional safeguards. Highlighting the need for a preliminary inquiry under Section 173(3) BNSS before registering such FIR’s.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Sometimes, In The Quest For Justice We End Up Doing Injustice.

In High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of U.P. & Ors., 2024 INSC 150, a Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court while overruling its own three-judge bench decision, unanimously held that automatic vacation of stay orders after a lapse of six months is against the basic tenets of justice, provides undue benefit to... Read more » Read more »

Identification of the father will not precede the privacy rights of Children.

In APARNA AJINKYA FIRODIA v. AJINKYA ARUN FIRODIA (2023 INSC 146), the Supreme Court ruled that a DNA test of a child cannot be ordered merely to establish adultery in matrimonial disputes. The case arose from a husband’s application for a DNA test to question the paternity of his wife’s second child during ongoing divorce... Read more » Read more »

Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel Vs. Union of India & Ors

In Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court emphasized that the benefit of a favorable judicial order against government actions should be extended to similarly situated individuals without requiring them to approach the courts. The appellant, an officer in the Army Dental Corps, sought parity with others granted permanent... Read more » Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.