Police must undertake a preliminary enquiry under section 173 (3) in cases where complaint doesn’t constitute a cognizable offencepunishable with more than 3 years.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Police must undertake...

In the case of Imran Pratapgarhi v. State of Gujarat 2025 INSC 410, the Supreme Court quashed an FIR against the appellant, a Rajya Sabha MP, for reciting and posting a poem at a public event. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 196, 197(1), 299, 302, and 57 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, claiming the poem incited hatred and undermined national unity. The Court held that the FIR was filed mechanically, lacked legal substance, and violated the appellant’s fundamental right to free speech under Article 19(1)(a).

After scrutinizing the Urdu poem and its translation, the Court found no reference to any religion, community, or incitement to violence. It emphasized that the poem conveyed a message of non-violence and resilience against injustice. The Court ruled that no offence was made out under the cited BNS provisions and criticized the High Court for ignoring constitutional safeguards. Highlighting the need for a preliminary inquiry under Section 173(3) BNSS before registering such FIR’s.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

State of Rajasthan Vs. Love Kush Meena, 2020 Scc Online Sc 1177

The court held that for an accused acquitted to join as a police constable, mere acquittal will not be sufficient. The court observed that being acquitted on the absence of any evidence is different from acquittal based on grounds of benefit of doubt. Thereby, in the case of an heinous Read more »

Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. Chief Minister, Maharashtra, SLP (C) 15737/2019, Judgment date: 05-05-2021

The classification of Marathas as a socially and educationally backward class was unreasonable as they belonged to a politically dominant caste with significant economic resources. The court also concluded that the majority opinion in the Indra Sawhney case was correct and that the limit of 50 percent for caste-based reservations Read more »

Borrower Availing Loan for Profit-Generating Exercise Not a Consumer Under Consumer Protection Act

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in its recent judgment in The Central Bank of India & Ors. v. M/s AD Bureau Advertising Pvt. Ltd. & Anr1, has categorically held that borrowers who avail loans for commercial or profit-generating purposes do not fall within the definition of 'consumer' under Section Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.