Sourav Das Vs. Union of India, W.P. (Civil) 1126 of 2022

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Sourav Das Vs....

The Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with a Public Interest Litigation has held that Chargesheets cannot be published on police or government websites for public viewing on par with FIRs as it may violate the rights of the accused, victim and investigation agencies. Additionally, it was held that the chargesheet / documents along with the chargesheet cannot be said to be public documents under Section 74 of the Evidence Act.

The petitioners therein have heavily relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in Youth Bar Association of India v. Union of India where, it had directed copies of FIRs to be published within 24 hours of their registration on the police websites or the websites of the State Governments. The Hon’ble supreme court had observed that the FIR and the Chargesheet cannot be considered on the same footing and that previously, the FIR Was ordered to be published to ensure that the Accused is not taken by surprise.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

The Personality Behind The Work Tracing The Contours Of Personality Rights Under Indian Copyright Law

Anup Koushki Karavadi and Kanishk Tiwari Introduction In the collective imagination of Indian popular culture, certain expressions have become inseparable from the personalities who coined them. The irreverent “Bhidu” of Jackie Shroff, the resonant baritone of Amitabh Bachchan, or the poised elegance of Aishwarya Rai. These traits transcend the screen Read more »

Reconciling Conflicting Supreme Court Judgments: High Courts Must Harmonize Rather Than Choose

Judicial precedents play a crucial role in shaping legal principles and ensuring consistency in the application of the law. However, there are instances where two Supreme Court judgments appear to contradict each other, creating a complex situation for High Courts. How should High Courts proceed in such cases? Can they Read more »

Post-Award Section 9 Relief Available to Unsuccessful Party in Rare and Compelling Cases

In National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd. v. Ishvakoo (India) Pvt. Ltd. the Supreme Court held that an unsuccessful party in arbitration is not, merely by reason of having lost the arbitration, precluded from invoking Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 at the post-award stage. The Court clarified Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.