Posthumous Reproduction Not Prohibited By Law – Delhi High Court

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Posthumous Reproduction Not...

In W.P.(C) 15159/2021, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court recognized preserved reproductive genetic material as inheritable “property” under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, permitting the release of a deceased unmarried man’s biological genetic material to his parents for surrogacy, emphasizing that his consent for preservation extended to its posthumous use. The court noted the absence of provisions on posthumous reproduction in the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act, 2021, and the Surrogacy Regulation Act, 2021, and directed the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to consider formulating comprehensive guidelines or legislation. Additionally, the release of genetic material was strictly conditioned on ethical compliance and non-commercial use, ensuring that it aligns with legal and moral standards while addressing the evolving legal framework surrounding reproductive rights and inheritance.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Mohd. Hashim Vs. State of U.P. & Others (2017) 2 SCC 198

This case reinforces the principle that when the law prescribes a mandatory minimum sentence, courts do not have the authority to impose a lesser sentence unless explicitly provided by the statute. Interpretation of statutory provisions regarding minimum sentences and the discretion of the court in imposing such sentences. The Supreme Court clarified that a minimum... Read more » Read more »

No State-Specific Domicile, Strikes Down Domicile-Based PG Medical Reservations – SC

In Shobha v. Muthoot Finance, SLP(C) Nos. 2625-2627/2025, the Hon’ble Supreme Court clarified that writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution are not maintainable against Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs). The Court held that NBFCs, being private entities, do not perform public functions, and mere regulatory oversight under a statute does not subject them to... Read more » Read more »

Chetanram Chaudhary & Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra; (2000) 8 SCC 457

Evidence Law – Appreciation of Testimony – Minor contradictions in the testimony, while appreciating the evidence in criminal trial -contradictions in material particulars and not minor contradictions can be a ground to discredit the testimony of the witnesses. Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.