Posthumous Reproduction Not Prohibited By Law – Delhi High Court

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Posthumous Reproduction Not...

In W.P.(C) 15159/2021, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court recognized preserved reproductive genetic material as inheritable “property” under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, permitting the release of a deceased unmarried man’s biological genetic material to his parents for surrogacy, emphasizing that his consent for preservation extended to its posthumous use. The court noted the absence of provisions on posthumous reproduction in the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act, 2021, and the Surrogacy Regulation Act, 2021, and directed the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to consider formulating comprehensive guidelines or legislation. Additionally, the release of genetic material was strictly conditioned on ethical compliance and non-commercial use, ensuring that it aligns with legal and moral standards while addressing the evolving legal framework surrounding reproductive rights and inheritance.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

M/s. Shriram Investments Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax III, Chennai (2024 INSC 760)

The appellant initially filed a return in November 1989 and revised it twice. The Income Tax Officer rejected the second revised return, declaring that it was barred by limitation u/s 139(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which only allows a revised return to be filed before the earlier of Read more »

Commercial Arbitral Awards: Civil Courts Ousted From Execution Jurisdiction

In Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. v. R.K. Mining Private Limited, subsequently reaffirmed in U.V. Satyanarayana and Ors. v. M/s Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that Execution Petitions arising from arbitral awards in commercial disputes of the specified value lie exclusively before the designated Read more »

Sangeet Vs. State Of Haryana, (2013) 2 SCC 452.

The court observed that, it is a common misperception that a person facing a life sentence has an unassailable right to be released after serving 14 or 20 years in jail. No such right exists for the prisoner. Subject to any remission granted by the appropriate government under Section 432 Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.