Gunshot Enough to Establish Intention to Cause Death for Offence of Attempt to Murder

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Gunshot Enough to...

In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Shamsher Singh, 2025 INSC 503, the Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with a Criminal Appeal set aside the impugned order of the Hon’ble High Court and held that Section 307 (Attempt to Murder) would stand attracted when there is intention or knowledge to cause death, though the hurt may be simple or grievous in nature. The sole Accused, working as a constable in the army, being unsatisfied with the food served at the mess during his posting, decided to settle scores then and there by opening fire with his AK-47 upon other constables, causing them grievous hurt. The High Court had reversed the conviction of the Trial Court and acquitted the Accused U/s. 307 and S. 27 of Arms Act, 1959 and instead convicted him U/s. 326 for grievous hurt, observing that there was a lack of intention or knowledge to cause death on his part. The Hon’ble Supreme Court restored the judgment of the Trial Court, observing that the Sole Accused, being in the army was well aware that a gunshot from such a weapon, if it hits anyone, can certainly result in causing death.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Supreme Court Upholds Post-Delivery Penalty for Mis declared Goods by Railways

In Union of India v. M/s Kamakhya Transport Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 805), the Supreme Court held that Indian Railways can recover penalties for misdeclared consignments even after… Read more »

Vishwanath Biradar v. Deepika & Ors., SLP (Crim.) Appeal No 4123/2021 (Date of Judgment: 11-06-2021)

The direction to take the accused into custody is beyond the jurisdiction of the High Court. Whether an accused is liable to be arrested is based upon the… Read more »

Rethinking Scrutiny of Question of Fact under Writ Jurisdiction

Mere existence of a question of fact has long been considered an obstacle to Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution—a stance reinforced through numerous precedents1 pronounced… Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.