Functional Disability Must Prevail Over Mechanical Schedule Interpretation

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Functional Disability Must...

In Kamal Dev Prasad v. Mahesh Forge, 2025 INSC 591, the Hon’ble Supreme Court while considering an issue of workplace injury compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act,1932 held that a disability and loss of earning capacity should not be assessed only on the basis of the Schedule, especially when there is an ambiguity but on the actual functional loss and impact on earning capacity. The Appellant worker, a forging machine operator, lost multiple phalanges on four fingers of his right hand in a factory accident. The commissioner awarded 100% disability compensation, along with 12% interest and 50% penalty for the employer’s delay in payment. However, the High Court reduced the disability to 34% by mechanically applying Schedule 1 of the act based on the loss of phalanges of each of the fingers but not the total impact. The Hon’ble Supreme Court stated that disability should not be assessed only on the basis of the Schedule but on the actual functional loss and impact on earning capacity. The Court held that injury and loss of use of the right hand severely affected the worker’s ability to perform his job. It fixed functional disability at 50% and awarded compensation accordingly, with interest and penalty reaffirming the beneficial nature of the legislation.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

When Development Dilutes Deterrence: Rethinking Decriminalization Of Environmental Laws In India

The Brundtland Commission described sustainable development as a model of progress that safeguards the needs of future generations while addressing those of the present.1 This conception was never intended to become a pretext for developing economies to deplete ecological resources in pursuit of economic expansion.... Read more »

Ajay Madhusudan Patel & Ors. v. Jyotrindra S. Patel & Ors

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ajay Madhusudan Patel while appointing a sole arbitrator, reiterated factors that signify the intention of a non-signatory to be bound by the Arbitration Agreement. The factors as laid down in Cox and Kings being – mutual intent of parties, relationship of a non-signatory with a signatory... Read more »

Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. Chief Minister, Maharashtra, SLP (C) 15737/2019, Judgment date: 05-05-2021

The classification of Marathas as a socially and educationally backward class was unreasonable as they belonged to a politically dominant caste with significant economic resources. The court also concluded that the majority opinion in the Indra Sawhney case was correct and that the limit of 50 percent for caste-based reservations did not need consideration by... Read more » Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.