Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2013 SCC OnLine Bom 359

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma...

The Court held in the Instant case that the following, among other circumstances, can generally be used to determine if someone had the intent to cause death:

  1. The type of weapon used,
  2. whether the accused carried the weapon or if it was picked up there,
  3. whether the blow is intended at a crucial area of the body,
  4. The amount of force used to inflict harm,
  5. Whether the act occurred during a sudden argument,
  6. Whether the incident was accidental or the result of premeditation,
  7. Whether the deceased was a stranger or there had been any prior animosity,
  8. Whether there was any serious or unexpected provocation, and if so, what caused it,
  9. Whether the alleged offender delivered a single strike or multiple blows,
  10. Whether the alleged victim of injury was unfairly treated or acted in a cruel and unusual manner.
Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Youth Bar Association Vs. Union of India, W.P.(CRL.) NO.68 of 2016

The Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with a Writ Petition in this landmark decision issued a slew of directions to make First Information Reports (FIRs) available to the accused and the public at large. The Hon’ble Court directed that all police stations shall upload FIRs within 24 hours except in cases of sensitive nature involving... Read more » Read more »

Krishna Mahadev Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2021 Scc Online Bom 191

The court observed that, the circumstance of ‘last seen’, along with the failure to provide a reasonable explanation of the accused are not enough to establish the guilt of the accused being reasonable doubt. As the case was relying on the last seen theory and no plausible explanation was provided by the accused, the guilt... Read more » Read more »

National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.

In the case of National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors., the Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the NCPCR under Article 32, emphasizing that statutory bodies created to protect fundamental rights cannot invoke Article 32 to enforce their mandates against state authorities or private entities.... Read more » Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.