Actions of the Governors and the President are subject to judicial review

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Actions of the...

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, while dealing with a Writ Petition filed by the State of Tamil Nadu, held that the Governor cannot keep bills submitted to them pending without response indefinitely. The Court also held that delays in granting assent to bills that were repassed by the legislature, without any reason are both illegal and erroneous in law, and to put an end to the dispute, it also prescribed various timelines to be followed for the grant of assent and prevent arbitrary delays. The Court also stated that actions of Governors and the President are subject to judicial review as absence of the would shield their actions “in a lead casket” even in cases of constitutional violation.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Raghuveer Sharan Vs. District Sahakari Krishi Gramin Vikas Bank & Anr., 2024 INSC 681

The Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding an SLP against an order of MP High Court dismissing the appellant's revision application held that S.132 of The Evidence Act, 1872 does not provide absolute immunity to the witness making self-incriminating statements as the same could be abused by an influential person with Read more »

Substance Over Form: The Supreme Court’s Fiduciary Turn in Resource Allocation

Abstract The Supreme Court’s decision in Kamla Nehru Memorial Trust v. U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (2025 INSC 791) represents more than the resolution of a dispute over an industrial allotment. It marks a doctrinal convergence of three significant strands of Indian jurisprudence: (i) the insistence on reciprocal obligations Read more »

Anil Yashwant Karande Vs. Mangal Anil Karande, 2015 SCC OnLine Bom 6257

The court observed that, by submitting an application under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for the restoration of conjugal rights within the same roof, a spouse cannot claim that they would force another person to cohabit with them and treat them cruelly at the same time. Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.