Actions of the Governors and the President are subject to judicial review

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Actions of the...

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, while dealing with a Writ Petition filed by the State of Tamil Nadu, held that the Governor cannot keep bills submitted to them pending without response indefinitely. The Court also held that delays in granting assent to bills that were repassed by the legislature, without any reason are both illegal and erroneous in law, and to put an end to the dispute, it also prescribed various timelines to be followed for the grant of assent and prevent arbitrary delays. The Court also stated that actions of Governors and the President are subject to judicial review as absence of the would shield their actions “in a lead casket” even in cases of constitutional violation.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

National Fertilizers Ltd and Another Vs. P.K.Khanna; 2005 (7) SCC 597

The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in a Departmental enquiry, the Decision/order by disciplinary authority, is required to give reasons only when it disagrees with finding of the enquiry officer and not when it concurs with that finding. Also, held that the mere quoting of what transpired would not Read more »

Trust Without Liability: The Supreme Court Clarifies Interplay Of Trusts And Cheque Dishonour Complaints Under The NI Act

Anup Koushik Karavadi and Kanishk Tiwari Introduction The Supreme Court’s judgment in Sankar Padam Thapa v. Vijaykumar Dineshchandra Agarwal (2025 INSC 1210) has conclusively addressed a long-standing ambiguity at the intersection of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the Indian Trusts Act, 1882. The Court was called upon to decide Read more »

Identification of the father will not precede the privacy rights of Children.

In APARNA AJINKYA FIRODIA v. AJINKYA ARUN FIRODIA (2023 INSC 146), the Supreme Court ruled that a DNA test of a child cannot be ordered merely to establish adultery in matrimonial disputes. The case arose from a husband's application for a DNA test to question the paternity of his wife's Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.