Actions of the Governors and the President are subject to judicial review

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Actions of the...

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, while dealing with a Writ Petition filed by the State of Tamil Nadu, held that the Governor cannot keep bills submitted to them pending without response indefinitely. The Court also held that delays in granting assent to bills that were repassed by the legislature, without any reason are both illegal and erroneous in law, and to put an end to the dispute, it also prescribed various timelines to be followed for the grant of assent and prevent arbitrary delays. The Court also stated that actions of Governors and the President are subject to judicial review as absence of the would shield their actions “in a lead casket” even in cases of constitutional violation.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Decoding India’s Data Protection Laws Against Global Standards

In an era where personal data has become the lifeblood of the digital economy, protection of individual privacy has never been more critical. Increasing reliance on technology has amplified concerns over data misuse, highlighted by the recent breach of user privacy by Apple2, where private conversations were reportedly... Read more »

Gattification Through Appellate Paralysis: Wto’s Dispute Settlement Crisis And Pathways Forward

The World Trade Organization (WTO), established in 1995, replaced the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which began in 1947. GATT set early rules for international trade but functioned mainly as a diplomatic arrangement, lacking strong enforcement mechanisms. The WTO carried forward GATT’s principles... Read more »

Supreme Court Reiterates Mandatory Guidelines for Execution of Decrees

Noting persistent delays in execution proceedings, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Periyammal (Dead) Though LRs & Ors. v. V. Rajamani & Anr. Etc. reaffirmed mandatory guidelines established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi for conducting executing proceedings. Citing Bhoj Raj Garg v. Goyal Education and Welfare Society & Ors... Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.