Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh Vs. State of Bihar (2024 INSC 763)

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Shashi Bhushan Prasad...

In Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar (2024 INSC 763), the Bihar Technical Service Commission (BTSC) disqualified candidates with private university diplomas unapproved by the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) in its recruitment for Junior Engineers. This criterion was challenged based on Bharathidasan University v. AICTE (2001), which held that universities do not require AICTE approval for technical programs. The Patna High Court initially directed BTSC to complete the selection but allowed the State to cancel the process and restart recruitment with amended rules, a decision later appealed by the aggrieved candidates. In a pivotal decision, the Supreme Court rejected the State’s move to cancel the selection, citing K. Manjusree v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2008), where altering selection criteria post-selection was deemed unfair as it “changes the rules of the game after the game has been played.” The Court directed BTSC to create a fresh selection list, incorporating both the previously disqualified candidates and those initially selected, thus upholding the candidates’ rights against arbitrary rule changes.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Dharmendra Sharma Vs. Agra Development Authority, 2024 INSC 667

The Supreme Court addressed a dispute over the delayed possession of an apartment. The appellant sought a refund with interest due to the respondent's failure to provide necessary completion and firefighting clearance certificates. When the Respondent had pleaded the application to be barred by limitation on the ground that the Read more »

Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. General Manager & Anr

In Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd. v. General Manager & Anr., 2024 INSC 889, the Supreme Court clarified that under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, courts can extend the mandate of an arbitral tribunal even after its expiry, provided "sufficient cause" exists. The tribunal’s mandate, which lapsed on Read more »

Has ‘Limitation’ Become Limitless? Rethinking the Boundaries for Initiating Arbitration Proceedings

Introduction In the recent ruling in M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Vs. M/s Aptech Ltd., Arbitration Petition No. 29 of 2023, the Hon’ble Supreme Court undertook an exhaustive exercise of tracing the law and identifying the existing legislative vacuum regarding the limitation for both the initiation of arbitration proceedings and Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.