Supreme Court Declares Ex-Post Facto Environmental Clearances Unconstitutional

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Supreme Court Declares...

In Vanashakti v. Union of India (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1139), the Supreme Court declared ex-post facto environmental clearances unconstitutional, reinforcing that prior clearance under the EIA Notification, 2006 is mandatory. Citing Common Cause (2017) and misuse seen after Pahwa Plastics (2022), the Court stressed stricter environmental governance and procedural compliance. While future retrospective clearances are barred, existing ones remain valid, leaving concerns for ongoing projects.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Arbitration at the Crossroads of Energy Regulations: Critical Assessment of Cerc’s Exclusive Arbitration Referral Authority

– Anup Koushik Karavadi and Kanishk Tiwari Introduction Poised between private autonomy and statutory control, Arbitration occupies a peculiar space in India’s energy sector. Projects contracts such as Power purchase agreements (PPAs), transmission contracts, and implementation agreements increasingly incorporate arbitration clauses, reflecting the sector’s growing commercial sophistication and the parties’ Read more »

Shivaji chintappa patil Vs. State of Maharashtra, Air 2021 Sc 1249

The court laid down certain guidelines which must be followed before a case against an accused can be fully established: (a) circumstances from which conclusion of guilt is drawn must be established fully, (b) there should be consistency between the facts established and the hypothesis of guilt of the accused, Read more »

National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.

In the case of National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors., the Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the NCPCR under Article 32, emphasizing that statutory bodies created to protect fundamental rights cannot invoke Article 32 to enforce their mandates against Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.