High Court Can’t Become Guardian of Limitation Without Pleadings : Limitation Must Be Pleaded, Not Presumed

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. High Court Can’t...

In Jai Ram Vs. Som Prakash & Anr. etc., 2025 INSC 227, the Hon’ble Supreme Court chided the High Court for setting-aside a reasoned order of the District Court on the ground of limitation when the issue of limitation was never pleaded, raised or evidence for the same led before the District Court. The underlying dispute revolved around rival wills, wherein the Appellant found about the grant of letters of administration issued way back in the year 1999, only in 2013 and thereafter filed application for its revocation before District Court in 2016, which was allowed on merits. On Appeal, the Respondent who had raised no whisper of limitation, suddenly sprang the issue of limitation as a weapon before the High Court, which allowed the appeal and set aside the order. This compelled the Supreme Court to intervene and call out the error, setting-aside the order of High Court and remanded the appeals to be considered afresh purely on merits without going into the question of limitation.

Tags:

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Balu Sudam Khalde & Another Vs. State of Maharashtra; 2023 SCC Online SC 355

The Evidence of Injured witness has greater evidentiary value, their statements can't be discarded lightly. Also the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that, Suggestions made to the witness by the defence counsel and the reply to such suggestions would definitely form part of the evidence and can be relied upon Read more »

Ajay Madhusudan Patel & Ors. v. Jyotrindra S. Patel & Ors

Ajay Madhusudan Patel & Ors. v. Jyotrindra S. Patel & Ors. 1 (On Factors that Signify Intention of Non-Signatory to be bound by the Arbitration Agreement - Yogitha Jammula2 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ajay Madhusudan Patel3 while appointing a sole arbitrator, reiterated factors that signify the intention of a Read more »

H Siddaraju & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors

In H Siddaraju & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. (2023), the Karnataka High Court addressed a challenge to Sections 4(iii)(c)(I) and 2(1)(zg) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, which impose age limits of 50 for women and 55 for men and restrict altruistic surrogacy to genetically related surrogate Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.